Skip to content
SearchLocal help →

Community life in Portsmouth

How life feels in Portsmouth

Do people feel they belong? Can they have a say? These survey answers add residents’ experiences to the facts about homes and services.

Survey estimates Portsmouth · people aged 16 and over · 2025/26 release.

● Local estimate   ■ England estimate. Lines show the range of uncertainty, not changes over time. Small differences alone do not establish a meaningful gap.

Community and belonging

Often or always lonely

7.0%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 6.7%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How often do you feel lonely?
Answer counted: Often/Always

95% confidence interval: 4.7%–10.2%. Sample: 527 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table C3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Feel they belong in their neighbourhood

57.6%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 61.2%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How strongly do you feel you belong to your immediate neighbourhood?
Answer counted: GROUPED: Very/Fairly strongly

95% confidence interval: 52.0%–62.9%. Sample: 474 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table D3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Proud to live in their area

51.5%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 61.6%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - I am proud to live in my local area
Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

95% confidence interval: 45.5%–57.5%. Sample: 493 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table E3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Would recommend their area

57.5%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 65.1%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - I would recommend my local area to others as a good place to live
Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

95% confidence interval: 51.0%–63.8%. Sample: 448 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table E7, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Satisfied with their area

69.2%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 72.6%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: Satisfaction with your local area as a place to live
Answer counted: GROUPED: Satisfied

95% confidence interval: 63.9%–74.1%. Sample: 503 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table E13, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Satisfied with local green spaces

67.2%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 75.9%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the green and natural spaces in your local area?
Answer counted: GROUPED: Satisfied

95% confidence interval: 61.3%–72.7%. Sample: 447 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table E16, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Having a say

Feel able to influence local decisions

24.9%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 26.4%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that you personally can influence decisions affecting your local area?
Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

95% confidence interval: 20.6%–29.8%. Sample: 503 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table B3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Volunteer through a group at least monthly

18.1%

October 2025–March 2026

0%50%100%

England: 18.2%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · October 2025–March 2026.

Question: Formal volunteering at least once a month in the last 12 months
Answer counted: Total (yes)

95% confidence interval: 14.1%–23.0%. Sample: 503 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Original table G3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Culture and libraries

Attend or take part in arts in person

89.0%

April 2025–March 2026 · experiences in the previous 12 months

0%50%100%

England: 83.4%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · April 2025–March 2026. Answers refer to the previous 12 months.

Question: Engaged with the arts in person in the last 12 months
Answer counted: Total

95% confidence interval: 85.4%–91.8%. Sample: 549 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Original table I3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Visit heritage places in person

64.7%

April 2025–March 2026 · experiences in the previous 12 months

0%50%100%

England: 62.4%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · April 2025–March 2026. Answers refer to the previous 12 months.

Question: Visited a heritage site in person at least once in the last 12 months
Answer counted: Any type of heritage in Table J1 rows 19 to 28

95% confidence interval: 59.4%–69.6%. Sample: 549 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Original table J3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Use library services in person

41.1%

April 2025–March 2026 · experiences in the previous 12 months

0%50%100%

England: 30.9%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · April 2025–March 2026. Answers refer to the previous 12 months.

Question: Visited a public library building or mobile library in person at least once [Note 11]
Answer counted: Visited a public library building or mobile library in-person in my leisure time Visited by a home library service Used another library outreach services

95% confidence interval: 35.7%–46.8%. Sample: 512 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history. Library questions were omitted from the community paper questionnaire in 2025/26; the sample base is smaller. Includes home and outreach library services, not just building visits.

Original table K3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Visit museums or galleries in person

47.1%

April 2025–March 2026 · experiences in the previous 12 months

0%50%100%

England: 41.9%

How this was measured

Community and Engagement Survey · People aged 16 and over · April 2025–March 2026. Answers refer to the previous 12 months.

Question: Visited a museum or gallery in person at least once in the last 12 months
Answer counted: Visited during leisure time

95% confidence interval: 42.1%–52.3%. Sample: 549 people answering this question. This is a sample count, not a count of residents with this experience.

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Original table M3, cell D196 ↗ · Publication and methods ↗

Source release: 2026-07-31. Checked 2026-10-16. Agent source and calculation checks; independent review outstanding.

Compare all three areas and England → · Download figures and uncertainty (CSV) · Shared evidence file

Being active

Adult and children’s activity use different definitions. Explore Sport England’s published results ↗. We have not republished these tables or neighbourhood models while their file-reuse terms remain unresolved.

Explore all 74 local survey measures

Southampton, Portsmouth and Chichester district, with England as a comparator. Open a question to see both published periods, the answer counted, uncertainty and sample sizes. These are residents’ survey answers, not council performance scores.

Chichester covers the whole district, including places outside the city. Missing results are not zero. Two observations are not a long-term trend, and a small difference does not establish a statistically significant change.

Download all 592 observations (CSV) · Data, definitions and publisher notes (JSON)

Civic engagement

Engagement in civic participation at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes) - Full base

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes) - Full base

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202641.5%36.3%–46.9%530A3!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202537.9%32.8%–43.3%465A3!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202639.7%34.6%–45.0%503A3!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202532.3%27.7%–37.4%496A3!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202639.1%34.2%–44.2%598A3!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202530.5%26.8%–34.4%675A3!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202638.0%37.8%–38.3%192,244A3!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202533.6%33.3%–33.9%177,749A3!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Engagement in civic consultation at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes) - Full base

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes) - Full base

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202623.9%19.7%–28.6%530A6!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202522.9%18.7%–27.7%465A6!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202623.0%19.2%–27.2%503A6!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202522.0%18.0%–26.7%496A6!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202616.5%13.4%–20.2%598A6!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202518.0%14.9%–21.4%675A6!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202620.3%20.1%–20.5%192,244A6!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202518.5%18.3%–18.8%177,749A6!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Engagement in civic activism at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 20269.6%7.1%–12.9%530A9!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 20257.9%5.7%–10.8%465A9!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20267.5%5.3%–10.5%503A9!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 20258.2%5.8%–11.5%496A9!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 20266.0%4.0%–9.0%598A9!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 20256.9%5.0%–9.4%675A9!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 20268.5%8.4%–8.7%192,244A9!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 20257.8%7.7%–8.0%177,749A9!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Engagement in civic participation, activism or consultation at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202649.7%44.6%–54.9%530A12!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202546.0%40.7%–51.5%465A12!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202648.9%43.5%–54.4%503A12!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202539.8%34.8%–45.2%496A12!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202645.1%40.1%–50.1%598A12!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202538.8%34.7%–43.1%675A12!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202645.8%45.5%–46.1%192,244A12!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202540.7%40.4%–41.0%177,749A12!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Involvement in social action in local area at least once in last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202617.1%13.6%–21.2%493A18!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202518.6%15.0%–22.9%458A18!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202611.9%8.1%–17.1%454A18!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202511.9%9.0%–15.5%495A18!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 20269.2%6.4%–12.9%539A18!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 20258.4%6.3%–11.1%675A18!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202613.5%13.3%–13.7%175,774A18!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202513.3%13.1%–13.5%176,330A18!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Local decisions

To what extent do you agree or disagree that you personally can influence decisions affecting your local area? — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202624.6%20.4%–29.5%530B3!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 202523.8%19.6%–28.7%463B3!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202624.9%20.6%–29.8%503B3!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 202521.5%17.8%–25.7%496B3!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202620.0%16.4%–24.2%598B3!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 202521.3%18.0%–24.9%671B3!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202626.4%26.1%–26.6%191,876B3!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202523.8%23.5%–24.0%177,210B3!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Column1

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults. Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Generally speaking, would you like to be more involved in the decisions your council makes that affect your local area — Yes

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Yes

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202627.8%23.4%–32.7%401B8!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 202522.9%18.5%–28.0%394B8!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202626.1%21.3%–31.6%423B8!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 202527.0%22.3%–32.2%462B8!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202627.0%22.4%–32.1%503B8!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 202532.3%27.9%–37.1%597B8!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202629.2%28.9%–29.5%159,758B8!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202528.3%28.0%–28.6%156,679B8!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Column1

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 sexual orientation and socio-economic classification data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults. Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Loneliness

How often do you feel lonely? — Often/Always

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Often/Always

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 20266.5%4.1%–9.9%547C3!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 20256.5%4.2%–10.0%456C3!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20267.0%4.7%–10.2%527C3!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 20256.9%4.9%–9.9%475C3!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202611.8%8.9%–15.5%636C3!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 20257.0%5.1%–9.6%645C3!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 20266.7%6.6%–6.9%200,639C3!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 20256.6%6.4%–6.7%170,971C3!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults. Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Note 5 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 10 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Indirect Loneliness — Score of 8 or 9

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Score of 8 or 9

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 20266.3%3.9%–10.1%462C6!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 20258.9%6.0%–13.1%440C6!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20269.6%6.5%–13.8%430C6!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202513.8%10.4%–18.0%441C6!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202614.2%10.5%–18.9%502C6!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202511.6%8.9%–15.1%610C6!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 20268.9%8.7%–9.1%160,813C6!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 20259.1%8.9%–9.3%160,755C6!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults. Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Note 5 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 10 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Neighbourhood

How strongly do you feel you belong to your immediate neighbourhood? — GROUPED: Very/Fairly strongly

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Very/Fairly strongly

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202661.6%55.9%–67.1%510D3!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202566.5%60.6%–71.9%459D3!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202657.6%52.0%–62.9%474D3!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202558.0%52.4%–63.3%470D3!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202647.1%41.4%–52.9%549D3!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202549.5%44.5%–54.6%640D3!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202661.2%60.9%–61.5%181,893D3!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202562.1%61.8%–62.4%170,685D3!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Frequency of chatting to neighbours more than to just say hello [Note 13] — At least once a month

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: At least once a month

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202672.3%66.5%–77.4%492D6!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202573.1%67.5%–78.0%457D6!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202663.5%57.1%–69.4%449D6!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202568.2%62.7%–73.2%490D6!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202660.9%54.8%–66.7%531D6!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202555.5%50.5%–60.4%664D6!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202668.5%68.2%–68.8%172,325D6!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202568.8%68.5%–69.1%174,352D6!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

To what extent would you agree or disagree that people in your neighbourhood pull together to improve the neighbourhood?[Note 10] — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202669.5%63.8%–74.7%499D9!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202570.3%64.7%–75.4%437D9!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202649.3%43.4%–55.1%474D9!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202545.8%40.2%–51.4%463D9!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202644.8%39.3%–50.4%573D9!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202539.4%35.0%–44.0%636D9!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202660.8%60.5%–61.1%181,228D9!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202555.8%55.5%–56.2%166,704D9!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Thinking about the people who live in this neighbourhood, to what extent do you believe they can be trusted? [Note 11] — Many of the people can be trusted

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Many of the people can be trusted

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202651.3%45.8%–56.9%464D12!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202562.5%56.5%–68.0%429D12!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202631.9%26.8%–37.4%428D12!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202531.2%25.8%–37.2%449D12!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202625.5%21.2%–30.3%504D12!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202524.0%20.1%–28.4%578D12!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202637.6%37.3%–37.9%168,392D12!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202540.3%40.0%–40.6%160,444D12!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

To what extent do you agree or disagree that this local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together? [Note 12] — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202682.3%77.6%–86.2%452D15!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202586.4%81.2%–90.4%388D15!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202672.7%67.7%–77.2%482D15!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202576.0%71.0%–80.4%477D15!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202673.0%68.4%–77.1%575D15!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202576.7%72.7%–80.3%639D15!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202678.5%78.3%–78.8%176,160D15!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202580.6%80.3%–80.8%162,888D15!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Do you think that over the past two years your area has… — Got better to live in

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Got better to live in

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 20266.3%4.2%–9.3%454D18!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 20255.3%3.4%–8.3%440D18!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20267.1%4.6%–10.7%419D18!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 20258.9%6.1%–12.9%453D18!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 20265.6%3.6%–8.5%501D18!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 20259.6%6.9%–13.1%595D18!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202611.4%11.2%–11.6%163,206D18!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202511.1%10.9%–11.3%164,491D18!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

How often do you watch, read or listen to local news? — GROUPED: At least every two weeks/ Once a month/ Less often

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: At least every two weeks/ Once a month/ Less often

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202681.2%76.4%–85.3%502D21!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202581.2%76.1%–85.4%464D21!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202680.1%73.9%–85.1%459D21!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202581.4%76.4%–85.5%495D21!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202681.0%75.9%–85.3%539D21!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202577.2%72.7%–81.1%671D21!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202680.7%80.4%–80.9%176,681D21!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202577.5%77.2%–77.8%177,330D21!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

How often do you watch, read or listen to local news? — I don't know any local news providers

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: I don't know any local news providers

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 20262.8%1.4%–5.5%502D23!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 20256.1%3.8%–9.8%464D23!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20265.7%3.3%–9.8%459D23!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 20256.6%4.3%–10.0%495D23!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 20264.2%2.5%–6.9%539D23!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 20259.4%6.8%–12.9%671D23!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 20265.1%5.0%–5.3%176,681D23!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202510.1%9.9%–10.3%177,330D23!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Not Applicable (N/A) Cells are marked as not applicable (N/A) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 Respondents who answered "Have not lived here long enough to say" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 10 Respondents who answered "Nothing needs improving" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 11 Respondents who answered "Just moved here" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 12 Respondents who answered "There are too few people in the local area" & "People in this area are all of the same background" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 13 Respondents who answered "Don't have any neighbours" are excluded from valid answers.

Note 14 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Pride and satisfaction

How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - I am proud to live in my local area — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202672.8%67.4%–77.7%516E3!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202577.0%71.6%–81.7%461E3!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202651.5%45.5%–57.5%493E3!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202550.8%45.3%–56.2%488E3!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202642.2%36.9%–47.7%581E3!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202541.7%36.8%–46.8%659E3!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202661.6%61.3%–61.9%187,955E3!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202559.7%59.4%–60.0%173,290E3!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - In five years’ time I would like to still be living in my local area — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202669.9%64.1%–75.2%480E5!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202572.4%66.6%–77.6%453E5!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202650.0%43.3%–56.6%430E5!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202547.4%41.8%–53.0%470E5!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202641.1%35.4%–47.0%508E5!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202545.1%40.1%–50.3%634E5!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202660.6%60.3%–60.9%167,185E5!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202561.0%60.6%–61.3%168,927E5!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? - I would recommend my local area to others as a good place to live — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202675.7%70.5%–80.3%496E7!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202579.9%74.8%–84.1%461E7!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202657.5%51.0%–63.8%448E7!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202553.6%48.1%–59.1%488E7!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202648.4%42.6%–54.2%524E7!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202549.8%44.6%–55.0%658E7!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202665.1%64.8%–65.5%172,595E7!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202566.0%65.7%–66.4%173,439E7!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Local area attractiveness — GROUPED: Agree

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Agree

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202681.7%76.6%–85.9%502E9!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202587.4%82.9%–90.9%465E9!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202646.4%40.4%–52.4%460E9!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202542.3%36.7%–48.2%495E9!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202632.1%27.3%–37.3%538E9!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202536.3%31.7%–41.3%673E9!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202658.3%58.0%–58.6%176,797E9!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202557.7%57.4%–58.1%177,530E9!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Satisfaction with your local area as a place to live — GROUPED: Satisfied

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Satisfied

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202684.3%79.2%–88.4%529E13!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202586.5%82.1%–90.0%465E13!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202669.2%63.9%–74.1%503E13!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202563.9%58.3%–69.2%496E13!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202660.0%54.9%–64.8%598E13!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202561.6%56.4%–66.6%673E13!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202672.6%72.4%–72.9%192,113E13!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202573.1%72.8%–73.4%177,621E13!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the green and natural spaces in your local area? — GROUPED: Satisfied

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Satisfied

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202686.1%81.0%–90.0%489E16!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202590.4%86.7%–93.1%459E16!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202667.2%61.3%–72.7%447E16!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202568.7%63.0%–73.9%479E16!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202662.6%56.9%–67.9%518E16!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202565.9%61.2%–70.2%651E16!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202675.9%75.6%–76.1%170,292E16!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202575.4%75.1%–75.7%171,801E16!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

How satisfied are you with the facilities and amenities in your local area — GROUPED: Satisfied

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: GROUPED: Satisfied

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202675.7%70.1%–80.6%500E19!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202575.1%69.6%–80.0%464E19!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202676.3%70.8%–81.1%460E19!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202582.0%77.5%–85.7%496E19!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202668.6%63.1%–73.6%539E19!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202575.9%71.7%–79.6%675E19!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202670.4%70.1%–70.6%176,715E19!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202575.1%74.8%–75.4%177,498E19!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Support networks

Have you mixed socially with people from different religious groups in any of the following places? [Note 4] [Note 6] — I haven’t mixed socially with people from different religious groups

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: I haven’t mixed socially with people from different religious groups

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202620.3%13.4%–29.5%125F8!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202525.0%16.6%–35.9%118F8!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20269.6%5.1%–17.4%122F8!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202520.0%12.7%–30.1%133F8!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202614.1%8.6%–22.2%141F8!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202511.4%7.0%–18.1%179F8!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202615.5%15.1%–15.9%45,162F8!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202516.7%16.3%–17.2%42,753F8!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socioeconomic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

There is at least one person in my life who… — I don’t currently have any of these types of connections

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: I don’t currently have any of these types of connections

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 20261.5%0.7%–3.4%489F11!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableF11!I63 (x)
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 20264.6%2.5%–8.3%447F11!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableF11!I196 (x)
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 20265.1%2.9%–9.0%518F11!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableF11!I235 (x)
EnglandOctober 2025–March 20263.4%3.3%–3.5%169,354F11!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableF11!I9 (x)

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socioeconomic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were asked to a subset of online respondents (approximately a third of the online sample)

Note 8 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Volunteering and giving

Formal volunteering at least once a month in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202622.0%18.0%–26.5%530G3!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202522.7%18.7%–27.2%465G3!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202618.1%14.1%–23.0%503G3!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202514.9%11.5%–19.0%496G3!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202617.4%13.8%–21.6%598G3!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202515.3%12.3%–18.8%675G3!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202618.2%18.0%–18.4%192,244G3!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202516.5%16.3%–16.8%177,749G3!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Formal volunteering at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202635.0%30.3%–40.1%530G5!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202538.5%33.4%–43.8%465G5!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202628.7%24.0%–34.0%503G5!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202527.1%22.7%–32.0%496G5!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202627.4%23.1%–32.1%598G5!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202525.9%22.0%–30.2%675G5!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202630.2%30.0%–30.5%192,244G5!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202528.4%28.1%–28.7%177,749G5!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Informal volunteering at least once a month in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202629.8%25.3%–34.6%530G7!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202525.6%21.2%–30.4%465G7!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202623.5%19.4%–28.1%503G7!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202526.7%22.6%–31.3%496G7!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202626.4%22.7%–30.5%598G7!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202522.3%18.9%–26.1%675G7!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202625.0%24.7%–25.2%192,244G7!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202524.1%23.9%–24.4%177,749G7!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Informal volunteering at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202648.6%43.5%–53.7%530G9!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202548.9%43.4%–54.4%465G9!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202646.0%40.6%–51.5%503G9!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202546.4%41.6%–51.3%496G9!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202645.7%41.0%–50.6%598G9!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202542.4%38.2%–46.8%675G9!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202645.1%44.8%–45.4%192,244G9!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202544.2%43.9%–44.5%177,749G9!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Formal or informal volunteering at least once a month in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202640.7%35.5%–46.0%530G11!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202535.9%30.9%–41.3%465G11!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202633.0%28.2%–38.2%503G11!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202533.9%29.4%–38.7%496G11!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202635.7%31.3%–40.3%598G11!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202532.6%28.5%–37.0%675G11!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202634.6%34.3%–34.8%192,244G11!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202532.8%32.6%–33.1%177,749G11!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Formal or informal volunteering at least once in the last 12 months — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202659.9%54.5%–65.0%530G13!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202560.3%54.7%–65.6%465G13!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202654.4%49.0%–59.7%503G13!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202555.3%50.4%–60.2%496G13!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202654.6%49.5%–59.5%598G13!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202553.2%48.6%–57.7%675G13!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202655.6%55.3%–55.9%192,244G13!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202553.9%53.6%–54.3%177,749G13!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Given money to charity in the last 4 weeks — Total (yes)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total (yes)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtOctober 2025–March 202675.3%65.4%–83.1%126G17!D63
Chichester districtOctober 2024–March 202576.7%64.2%–85.8%124G17!I63
PortsmouthOctober 2025–March 202666.7%57.3%–74.9%137G17!D196
PortsmouthOctober 2024–March 202575.2%65.7%–82.7%161G17!I196
SouthamptonOctober 2025–March 202664.8%55.5%–73.2%150G17!D235
SouthamptonOctober 2024–March 202551.1%42.0%–60.2%160G17!I235
EnglandOctober 2025–March 202665.5%65.0%–66.0%53,585G17!D9
EnglandOctober 2024–March 202566.5%66.0%–67.1%48,142G17!I9

CES community pathway, CLS methodology. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text Links

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community and Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals. This note applies to all tables.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells are marked as not applicable (x) where questions or response options were not asked in the comparison survey year, thus comparisons were not possible

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release(A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Partnership and funding In 2024/25 and 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Life Survey and the Community pathway of the Community and Engagement survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Correction to 2024/25 Sexual Orientation and Socio-economic Classification Data There is a small difference in the estimates for sexual orientation and socio-economic classification for 2024/25 compared to the previously published Community Life survey tables. This is due to a correction in the weighting methodology, updating these specific variables from a mixed weight to the correct web-only weight. The 2024/25 figures provided in this release reflect the corrected data.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community and Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 4 Percentages may not add up to 100% as respondents can select multiple answers.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 8 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 9 These questions were not included in the 2024/25 online or paper questionnaire and were only asked in 2025/26.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Culture and libraries

Engaged with the arts in person in the last 12 months — Total

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202691.0%87.4%–93.7%565I3!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI3!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202689.0%85.4%–91.8%549I3!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI3!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202683.1%78.4%–86.9%659I3!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI3!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202683.4%83.2%–83.6%210,096I3!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202589.7%89.3%–90.2%34,378I3!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Engaged with arts digitally at least once in the last 12 months — Live arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature Pre-recorded arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature Live music or dance event, watched as it was happening Pre-recorded music or dance event

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Live arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature Pre-recorded arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature Live music or dance event, watched as it was happening Pre-recorded music or dance event

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202636.4%31.8%–41.3%564I6!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI6!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202638.4%33.4%–43.7%547I6!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI6!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202635.8%31.4%–40.5%658I6!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI6!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202635.5%35.3%–35.8%209,821I6!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202534.8%34.2%–35.4%34,378I6!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Engaged with the arts physically or digitally in the last 12 months — Total

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202691.9%88.4%–94.5%565I8!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI8!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202690.3%86.8%–92.9%549I8!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI8!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202684.6%80.1%–88.2%659I8!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI8!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202684.4%84.2%–84.7%210,075I8!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202590.6%90.1%–91.0%34,378I8!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — Total

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202680.4%76.0%–84.2%564I10!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI10!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202679.5%74.4%–83.8%548I10!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI10!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202671.7%66.6%–76.3%659I10!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI10!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202672.5%72.2%–72.8%209,883I10!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202576.7%76.1%–77.3%34,298I10!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Total

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Total

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202681.6%76.7%–85.7%564I12!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI12!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202673.7%69.0%–78.0%548I12!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI12!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202671.4%66.5%–75.8%659I12!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI12!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202671.2%70.9%–71.5%210,013I12!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202578.4%77.9%–79.0%34,378I12!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — An exhibition of art, photography or sculptures

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: An exhibition of art, photography or sculptures

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202637.5%32.6%–42.7%564I14!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI14!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202624.7%20.6%–29.4%548I14!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI14!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202622.5%18.7%–26.8%659I14!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI14!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202626.5%26.3%–26.7%209,883I14!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202526.2%25.6%–26.8%34,298I14!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A theatre play, drama, musical, pantomime, ballet or opera

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A theatre play, drama, musical, pantomime, ballet or opera

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202652.6%47.1%–58.0%564I16!D63
Chichester districtMay 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI16!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202642.1%37.0%–47.3%548I16!D196
PortsmouthMay 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI16!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202635.4%30.9%–40.2%659I16!D235
SouthamptonMay 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI16!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202640.2%39.9%–40.5%209,883I16!D9
EnglandMay 2024–March 202539.6%39.0%–40.3%34,298I16!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — An event connected with literature, books, reading, poetry reading or writing

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: An event connected with literature, books, reading, poetry reading or writing

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202613.9%10.9%–17.4%564I18!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI18!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20267.4%5.3%–10.1%548I18!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI18!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20269.2%6.8%–12.3%659I18!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI18!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20268.6%8.4%–8.7%209,883I18!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20259.2%8.8%–9.5%34,298I18!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A cinema screening of a film or movie

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A cinema screening of a film or movie

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202656.3%50.8%–61.7%564I20!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI20!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202659.9%54.4%–65.1%548I20!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI20!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202651.7%46.8%–56.6%659I20!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI20!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202650.5%50.3%–50.8%209,883I20!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202554.2%53.5%–54.9%34,298I20!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A craft exhibition (not a crafts market; crafts include for example textiles, woodworking or ceramics)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A craft exhibition (not a crafts market; crafts include for example textiles, woodworking or ceramics)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202618.7%15.3%–22.7%564I22!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI22!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202612.7%10.0%–16.0%548I22!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI22!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20269.0%6.8%–11.8%659I22!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI22!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202611.3%11.2%–11.5%209,883I22!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202511.0%10.6%–11.4%34,298I22!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A live music event (for example, pop, jazz, electronic, choral, orchestra or folk)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A live music event (for example, pop, jazz, electronic, choral, orchestra or folk)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202641.8%36.7%–47.0%564I24!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI24!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202645.1%39.7%–50.6%548I24!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI24!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202638.7%33.9%–43.8%659I24!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI24!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202637.8%37.6%–38.1%209,883I24!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202538.9%38.2%–39.5%34,298I24!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — An arts festival and or carnival (for example, a food, craft or other cultural event)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: An arts festival and or carnival (for example, a food, craft or other cultural event)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202618.3%14.8%–22.3%564I26!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI26!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202623.0%19.0%–27.4%548I26!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI26!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202618.8%15.5%–22.6%659I26!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI26!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202619.2%19.0%–19.4%209,883I26!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202521.6%21.1%–22.2%34,298I26!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A street art event

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A street art event

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20265.4%3.7%–8.0%564I28!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI28!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202611.5%8.8%–15.0%548I28!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI28!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20265.5%3.8%–8.0%659I28!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI28!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20265.8%5.6%–5.9%209,883I28!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20256.5%6.2%–6.8%34,298I28!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A live dance event (for example, contemporary, world, street or ballroom)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A live dance event (for example, contemporary, world, street or ballroom)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20263.9%2.5%–6.2%564I30!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI30!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20265.5%3.3%–8.9%548I30!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI30!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20264.1%2.6%–6.4%659I30!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI30!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20264.8%4.7%–4.9%209,883I30!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20256.0%5.7%–6.3%34,298I30!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A fashion show

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A fashion show

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 2026Not availableNot available564I32!D63 (c)
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI32!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20260.6%0.2%–1.7%548I32!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI32!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20260.5%0.2%–1.3%659I32!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI32!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20261.1%1.1%–1.2%209,883I32!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20251.4%1.3%–1.6%34,298I32!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — A comedy event

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A comedy event

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202613.2%9.5%–18.1%564I34!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI34!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202618.1%14.2%–22.9%548I34!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI34!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202616.1%12.6%–20.3%659I34!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI34!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202614.7%14.5%–14.9%209,883I34!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202516.0%15.5%–16.5%34,298I34!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — An in-person esports contest or video game competition event

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: An in-person esports contest or video game competition event

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20261.0%0.3%–2.8%564I36!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI36!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20262.4%1.3%–4.4%548I36!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI36!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20261.2%0.6%–2.6%659I36!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI36!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20261.3%1.2%–1.4%209,883I36!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20252.0%1.8%–2.2%34,298I36!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Attended an arts event in the last 12 months — Some other cultural event in England

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Some other cultural event in England

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20263.0%1.7%–5.0%564I38!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI38!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20262.4%1.4%–4.2%548I38!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI38!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20262.6%1.5%–4.6%659I38!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI38!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20262.2%2.1%–2.3%209,883I38!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20252.8%2.6%–3.1%34,298I38!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Written stories, plays, or poetry

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Written stories, plays, or poetry

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20267.8%5.5%–11.0%564I40!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI40!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20268.7%6.1%–12.3%548I40!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI40!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20266.2%4.3%–8.9%659I40!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI40!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20266.2%6.1%–6.3%210,013I40!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20256.5%6.2%–6.9%34,378I40!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Read books, graphic novels or magazines

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Read books, graphic novels or magazines

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202669.7%64.3%–74.6%564I42!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI42!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202658.7%53.5%–63.8%548I42!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI42!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202655.4%50.4%–60.2%659I42!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI42!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202656.3%56.0%–56.6%210,013I42!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202562.9%62.2%–63.5%34,378I42!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Written, practised or performed music

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Written, practised or performed music

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202613.0%10.1%–16.7%564I44!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI44!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20268.6%6.2%–11.8%548I44!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI44!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202613.6%10.6%–17.3%659I44!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI44!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202610.2%10.0%–10.4%210,013I44!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202510.7%10.3%–11.1%34,378I44!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Painting, drawing, printmaking, calligraphy, colouring

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Painting, drawing, printmaking, calligraphy, colouring

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202622.4%18.8%–26.5%564I46!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI46!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202621.8%17.8%–26.3%548I46!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI46!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202620.6%17.2%–24.5%659I46!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI46!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202618.3%18.1%–18.5%210,013I46!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202520.1%19.6%–20.6%34,378I46!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Crafts (textile, sewing, ceramic, sculpting, carving, woodwork)

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Crafts (textile, sewing, ceramic, sculpting, carving, woodwork)

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202625.1%21.1%–29.7%564I48!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI48!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202620.6%16.9%–24.8%548I48!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI48!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202620.9%17.5%–24.9%659I48!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI48!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202618.8%18.6%–19.0%210,013I48!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202519.7%19.2%–20.2%34,378I48!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Choreographed or performed a drama or dance routine

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Choreographed or performed a drama or dance routine

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20262.3%1.4%–3.9%564I50!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI50!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20263.8%2.2%–6.5%548I50!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI50!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20262.6%1.5%–4.4%659I50!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI50!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20262.4%2.3%–2.5%210,013I50!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20252.6%2.4%–2.8%34,378I50!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Designed or programmed video games including on a smartphone or tablet

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Designed or programmed video games including on a smartphone or tablet

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 2026Not availableNot available564I52!D63 (c)
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI52!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20262.4%1.3%–4.6%548I52!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI52!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20262.2%1.0%–4.5%659I52!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI52!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20261.5%1.4%–1.5%210,013I52!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20251.7%1.6%–1.9%34,378I52!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Made films or videos including original video content and animations

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Made films or videos including original video content and animations

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20265.6%3.3%–9.2%564I54!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI54!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20264.3%2.5%–7.4%548I54!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI54!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20263.8%2.3%–6.1%659I54!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI54!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20263.3%3.2%–3.4%210,013I54!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20253.6%3.4%–3.8%34,378I54!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Photography as a hobby

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Photography as a hobby

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202616.6%13.2%–20.7%564I56!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI56!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202613.5%10.2%–17.6%548I56!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI56!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202615.1%12.1%–18.8%659I56!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI56!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202613.6%13.4%–13.8%210,013I56!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202516.4%16.0%–16.9%34,378I56!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Read news in a national printed newspaper Read news in a local printed newspaper

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Read news in a national printed newspaper Read news in a local printed newspaper

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202640.6%35.6%–45.9%564I58!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI58!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202627.4%23.2%–32.1%548I58!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI58!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202624.9%21.1%–29.1%659I58!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI58!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202632.8%32.5%–33.1%210,013I58!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202532.9%32.3%–33.6%34,378I58!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Read news in a national printed newspaper [Note 8]

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Read news in a national printed newspaper [Note 8]

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202634.1%29.2%–39.3%529I60!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI60!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202623.9%19.9%–28.6%502I60!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI60!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202621.0%17.3%–25.2%598I60!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI60!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202627.5%27.2%–27.7%192,074I60!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI60!I9 (x)

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Read news in a local printed newspaper [Note 8]

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Read news in a local printed newspaper [Note 8]

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202626.1%21.7%–31.1%529I62!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI62!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202617.9%14.3%–22.1%502I62!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI62!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202614.4%11.2%–18.2%598I62!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI62!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202620.9%20.7%–21.1%192,074I62!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI62!I9 (x)

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Participated in an arts activity in the last 12 months — Other art or creative activities

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Other art or creative activities

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 20263.7%2.4%–5.7%564I64!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI64!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 20261.7%0.9%–3.2%548I64!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI64!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20260.9%0.4%–1.9%659I64!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI64!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20261.9%1.8%–2.0%210,013I64!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20252.9%2.7%–3.1%34,378I64!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Events watched online last 12 months — A live arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A live arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202614.1%11.2%–17.6%564I66!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI66!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202611.5%8.6%–15.1%547I66!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI66!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 20269.3%7.1%–12.2%658I66!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI66!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 20269.9%9.8%–10.1%209,821I66!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20256.8%6.5%–7.2%34,378I66!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Events watched online last 12 months — A pre-recorded arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A pre-recorded arts event including theatre, visual arts or literature

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202613.6%10.7%–17.1%564I68!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI68!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202610.0%7.6%–13.2%547I68!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI68!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202611.4%8.6%–15.0%658I68!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI68!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202610.5%10.4%–10.7%209,821I68!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 20258.9%8.6%–9.3%34,378I68!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Events watched online last 12 months — A live music or dance event, watched as it was happening

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A live music or dance event, watched as it was happening

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202616.9%13.7%–20.6%564I70!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI70!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202618.5%15.0%–22.5%547I70!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI70!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202618.8%15.4%–22.8%658I70!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI70!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202617.2%17.0%–17.4%209,821I70!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202516.2%15.7%–16.7%34,378I70!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Events watched online last 12 months — A pre-recorded music or dance event

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: A pre-recorded music or dance event

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202619.0%15.6%–23.0%564I72!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI72!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202619.2%15.5%–23.4%547I72!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI72!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202619.7%16.1%–23.9%658I72!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableI72!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202619.3%19.1%–19.5%209,821I72!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202519.7%19.2%–20.2%34,378I72!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet Back to Index

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 The wording for the video payment questions has changed this year so when comparing to last years data so some answer codes may overlap.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Visited a heritage site in person at least once in the last 12 months — Any type of heritage in Table J1 rows 19 to 28

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Any type of heritage in Table J1 rows 19 to 28

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202674.3%68.7%–79.3%563J3!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ3!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202664.7%59.4%–69.6%549J3!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ3!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202663.5%58.6%–68.1%659J3!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ3!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202662.4%62.2%–62.7%209,895J3!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ3!I9 (x)

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Used heritage services digitally or online in the last 12 months — Taken a virtual walking tour of a historic town or city, heritage site, castle or monument in England (Not including drone flights) Researched your local history online Engaged with text, image, audio, video, or animation, games, or podcast content from heritage sites in England Viewed documents from an archive in England online

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Taken a virtual walking tour of a historic town or city, heritage site, castle or monument in England (Not including drone flights) Researched your local history online Engaged with text, image, audio, video, or animation, games, or podcast content from heritage sites in England Viewed documents from an archive in England online

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202626.6%22.6%–31.0%562J6!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ6!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202627.4%23.2%–32.2%549J6!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ6!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202627.7%23.8%–31.9%659J6!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ6!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202624.9%24.6%–25.1%209,765J6!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableJ6!I9 (x)

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Visited a public library building or mobile library in person at least once [Note 11] — Visited a public library building or mobile library in-person in my leisure time Visited by a home library service Used another library outreach services

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Visited a public library building or mobile library in-person in my leisure time Visited by a home library service Used another library outreach services

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202633.2%27.8%–39.0%464K3!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableK3!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202641.1%35.7%–46.8%512K3!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableK3!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202634.3%29.7%–39.2%623K3!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableK3!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202630.9%30.6%–31.2%192,966K3!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202526.2%25.6%–26.8%34,378K3!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history. Library questions were omitted from the community paper questionnaire in 2025/26; the sample base is smaller. Includes home and outreach library services, not just building visits.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 Questions on physical and digital engagement with libraries were omitted from the Community paper questionnaire in 2025/26 in error. As a result, the total unweighted base for libraries is lower than for the other cultural sectors.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Used public library services digitally or online in the last 12 months [Note 11] — Accessed library services digitally or online

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Accessed library services digitally or online

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202619.1%14.8%–24.2%463K6!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableK6!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202618.9%15.1%–23.4%511K6!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableK6!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202622.2%18.3%–26.6%621K6!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableK6!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202617.6%17.4%–17.8%192,872K6!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202515.7%15.2%–16.2%34,296K6!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when less than or equal to 30 respondents were asked the question, or less than or equal to 3 respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 2 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 5 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 6 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 7 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 8 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 9 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 10 There are three indirect measures of loneliness asked in the survey. These questions are; how often do you feel that you lack companionship, how often do you feel left out and how often do you feel isolated from others? These three questions each have three possible responses with a subsequent value; ‘Hardly ever or never’ = 1, ‘Some of the time’ = 2, ‘Often’ = 3. The response values to these three indirect questions are combined to create the Indirect Loneliness Composite score. Scores are between three and nine, three being the least lonely and nine being the most lonely. For further information, see Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys - Recommended measures for adults.

Note 11 Questions on physical and digital engagement with libraries were omitted from the Community paper questionnaire in 2025/26 in error. As a result, the total unweighted base for libraries is lower than for the other cultural sectors.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Visited a museum or gallery in person at least once in the last 12 months — Visited during leisure time

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Visited during leisure time

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202653.0%47.3%–58.6%565M3!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableM3!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202647.1%42.1%–52.3%549M3!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableM3!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202639.4%34.5%–44.5%659M3!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableM3!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202641.9%41.6%–42.2%209,789M3!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202541.5%40.8%–42.2%34,338M3!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 2 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 5 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 6 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 7 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 8 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 9 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Used museums services digitally or online in the last 12 months — Taken a virtual tour of a museum or gallery in England Researched items from a museum or gallery collection in England online Engaged with text, image, audio, video, or animation, games, or podcast content from museums in England

Population: People aged 16 and over. Answer counted: Taken a virtual tour of a museum or gallery in England Researched items from a museum or gallery collection in England online Engaged with text, image, audio, video, or animation, games, or podcast content from museums in England

Percent of the question’s eligible respondents; 95% confidence intervals. Sample sizes are unweighted respondents, not resident totals.
AreaFieldworkEstimate95% intervalSampleOriginal cell
Chichester districtApril 2025–March 202616.5%13.2%–20.5%563M6!D63
Chichester districtApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableM6!I63 (x)
PortsmouthApril 2025–March 202616.9%13.3%–21.3%547M6!D196
PortsmouthApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableM6!I196 (x)
SouthamptonApril 2025–March 202615.6%12.5%–19.4%659M6!D235
SouthamptonApril 2024–March 2025Not availableNot availableNot availableM6!I235 (x)
EnglandApril 2025–March 202615.4%15.2%–15.6%209,806M6!D9
EnglandApril 2024–March 202513.9%13.4%–14.4%34,378M6!I9

CES engagement pathway. Weighted survey estimate. Base is unweighted; respondent count is not a population count. Engagement pathway; check questionnaire and method before joining to Participation history.

Publisher notes, definitions and exclusions

Notes related to the data in this spreadsheet

Note number Note text

Weights Different weights have been used for questions/responses depending on whether they are in in the web and paper or paper only questionnaire, and the pathway they are located in within the survey. This note applies to all tables.

Paper and web questionnaires The Community Engagement Survey issues both paper and web questionnaires. In order to reduce respondent burden and due to routing complexities on a paper questionnaire, not all questions are included in the paper questionnaire. The web questionnaire is also split into core and subset questions. Subset questions are only asked of approximately a third of online respondents and core questions are asked to all respondents online. We have noted cases where questions were only asked to online or to a subset of online respondents. If there is no note attached then the question was asked to all respondents to the survey, using either web or paper questionnaires. The questionnaires can be found at the link below:

Community and Engagement Survey Questionnaires

Lower and Upper estimates Lower and upper estimates in all tables use 95% confidence intervals.

Base and Count Base and count are both unweighted. Base is the number of respondents who were asked the question(s). Count is the number of respondents who answered the question in the affirmative. This note applies to all tables.

Suppression Cells marked with 'c' indicate data suppression for quality control reasons. This suppression was applied when 30 or fewer respondents were asked the question, or 3 or fewer respondents provided answers. This note applies to all tables.

Unavailable Data Cells marked with 'x' indicate that data is unavailable. This is because it was not collected in that survey year. This note applies to all tables.

Not Applicable Data Cells marked with 'N/A' indicate that data are not applicable.

Methodological Alignment The Community pathway data tables in this release (A, B, C, D, E, F and G) have been produced using the methodology of the Community Life Survey (CLS) to allow for robust comparability with the CLS time-series. This methodology differs from the approach used to produce the Engagement pathway data tables (H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O) and the Participation Survey. We intend to reproduce the Community pathway data tables and the Community Life Survey time series using the Engagement pathway methodology in future to align the entire survey with a consistent methodological approach.

Note 1 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 2 These questions were not in the 2025/26 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 3 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of a subset of respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Note 4 These questions were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 5 These responses were not in the 2024/25 survey or prior survey years, thus comparisons are not applicable (N/A).

Note 6 Household Acorn © CACI Limited 2013 - 2025 Source: Acorn. The applicable copyright notices can be found at the Current Copyright and Third-Party Notices in the link below.

Acorn Copyright and Third-Party Notices

Note 7 The 2024/25 and 2025/26 survey years have used the gender identity question asked in the Census 2021 in England and Wales. It should be noted that in the Census 2021 data for England and Wales, patterns were identified that suggest that some respondents may not have interpreted the question as intended, notably those with lower levels of English language proficiency. Analysis of Scotland's census 2022, where the gender identity question was different, has added weight to this observation. Similar respondent error may have occurred during the data collection for these statistics so comparisons between subnational and other smaller group breakdowns should be considered with caution. More information can be found in the following links:

Analysis of Scotland's census

ONS sexual orientation and gender identity quality information report

National Statistical blog about the strengths and limitations of gender identity statistics

Note 8 In 2025/26, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the Community Engagement Survey to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. Local authority district breakdowns are available for these questions.

Note 9 These questions were not in the 2024/25 paper questionnaire, and were asked of all respondents online, so the results are only representative of the online population.

Publication and methods · released 2026-07-31. Source and calculation checks: 2026-10-18; independent review outstanding.

Earlier releases

Download 572 earlier DCMS observations (CSV) · Source files and archive method. These 2023/24 and 2024/25 releases retain their own definitions and source vintages. Estimate and interval columns in this archive are fractions: multiply by 100 for percent. Do not join them automatically into a trend.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DCMS Community and Engagement Survey. All 74 local-authority tables in the selected CES 2025/26 topic files, with the prior-year cells from that same release. Earlier releases are not spliced into a continuous trend.

Cost of living: income, bills, savings and financial strain →

People and organisations working locally

Team Portsmouth

The local partnership behind the city vision; published commitments need clear owners and outcomes.

Find out more ↗

Local Plan examination

Read the current hearing programme, evidence and inspector questions.

Find out more ↗

Safer Portsmouth Partnership

The local partnership coordinating community safety priorities.

Find out more ↗

Pompey Link

Check the pilot’s service zones and booking arrangements.

Find out more ↗