People aged 65 or over
17.6%21 March 2021 · Worcester
Show the workings
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents
18,291 out of 103,874.
Source and method →Worcester · England
Community life
Worcester council area. Every figure carries its own date.
A place is more than its average house price. The census shows who lives here and some of the pressures households face.
People reporting bad or very bad health
4.8%21 March 2021 · Worcester
Show the workings
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised
4,980 out of 103,872.
Source and method →Households facing at least one measured disadvantage
49.9%21 March 2021 · Worcester
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Show the workings
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
22,321 out of 44,720.
Source and method →Households facing two or more measured disadvantages
16.8%21 March 2021 · Worcester
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Show the workings
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
7,526 out of 44,720.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with no qualifications
17.4%21 March 2021 · Worcester
Show the workings
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
Residents aged 16 and over
14,869 out of 85,607.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent
33.7%21 March 2021 · Worcester
Show the workings
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
Residents aged 16 and over
28,872 out of 85,607.
Source and method →Different needs within the area
People reporting bad or very bad health
2.6% to 7.4%
People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.6% in St Nicholas to 7.4% in Warndon & Elbury Park — a gap of 4.8 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 16 of 16 current wards with comparable figures.
Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Nicholas | 2.6% | 137 | 5,318 |
| St Peter's Parish | 3.1% | 177 | 5,641 |
| St Clement | 3.9% | 225 | 5,741 |
| Battenhall | 3.9% | 243 | 6,192 |
| Claines | 3.9% | 323 | 8,225 |
| Leopard Hill | 4.1% | 259 | 6,273 |
| St John's | 4.2% | 240 | 5,670 |
| Cathedral | 4.3% | 259 | 6,016 |
| Lower Wick & Pitmaston | 4.5% | 254 | 5,649 |
| St Stephen | 4.7% | 245 | 5,241 |
| Arboretum | 4.8% | 295 | 6,117 |
| Nunnery | 4.9% | 442 | 8,955 |
| Fort Royal | 5.7% | 271 | 4,724 |
| Rainbow Hill | 6% | 413 | 6,846 |
| Dines Green & Grove Farm | 6.3% | 403 | 6,413 |
| Warndon & Elbury Park | 7.4% | 806 | 10,855 |
People aged 65 or over
11.9% to 27.7%
People aged 65 or over ranged from 11.9% in St Nicholas to 27.7% in Lower Wick & Pitmaston — a gap of 15.8 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 16 of 16 current wards with comparable figures.
Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Nicholas | 11.9% | 631 | 5,317 |
| Rainbow Hill | 12.4% | 849 | 6,832 |
| Fort Royal | 14% | 665 | 4,742 |
| Warndon & Elbury Park | 14.3% | 1,560 | 10,882 |
| Dines Green & Grove Farm | 14.3% | 919 | 6,407 |
| Leopard Hill | 14.4% | 905 | 6,279 |
| Cathedral | 14.6% | 878 | 6,006 |
| Nunnery | 16.1% | 1,437 | 8,945 |
| Arboretum | 16.4% | 1,002 | 6,123 |
| St Peter's Parish | 19.1% | 1,081 | 5,649 |
| St John's | 19.7% | 1,116 | 5,659 |
| Battenhall | 20.4% | 1,264 | 6,193 |
| St Clement | 21.8% | 1,247 | 5,733 |
| St Stephen | 21.8% | 1,141 | 5,225 |
| Claines | 25% | 2,048 | 8,205 |
| Lower Wick & Pitmaston | 27.7% | 1,561 | 5,641 |
People aged 16+ with no qualifications
10.3% to 28.6%
People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 10.3% in St Nicholas to 28.6% in Warndon & Elbury Park — a gap of 18.2 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 16 of 16 current wards with comparable figures.
Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Nicholas | 10.3% | 450 | 4,356 |
| Cathedral | 10.8% | 589 | 5,432 |
| Leopard Hill | 11.7% | 584 | 4,992 |
| St Peter's Parish | 12.3% | 584 | 4,730 |
| St Clement | 12.8% | 658 | 5,151 |
| Claines | 13.9% | 941 | 6,781 |
| Battenhall | 14.2% | 720 | 5,072 |
| St John's | 15.7% | 773 | 4,931 |
| Arboretum | 16.1% | 853 | 5,304 |
| Lower Wick & Pitmaston | 16.5% | 797 | 4,834 |
| St Stephen | 17.2% | 750 | 4,368 |
| Fort Royal | 21.1% | 828 | 3,923 |
| Nunnery | 21.4% | 1,505 | 7,022 |
| Dines Green & Grove Farm | 21.6% | 1,057 | 4,904 |
| Rainbow Hill | 25.3% | 1,370 | 5,417 |
| Warndon & Elbury Park | 28.6% | 2,396 | 8,385 |
Households facing two or more measured disadvantages
8.7% to 30%
Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 8.7% in St Nicholas to 30% in Warndon & Elbury Park — a gap of 21.3 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 16 of 16 current wards with comparable figures.
These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Nicholas | 8.7% | 193 | 2,218 |
| St Peter's Parish | 9.1% | 226 | 2,477 |
| Leopard Hill | 9.6% | 235 | 2,454 |
| Claines | 10.9% | 388 | 3,549 |
| Battenhall | 11.1% | 287 | 2,594 |
| Lower Wick & Pitmaston | 12.7% | 308 | 2,433 |
| St Stephen | 13.8% | 330 | 2,389 |
| St Clement | 14.3% | 301 | 2,109 |
| St John's | 15.8% | 393 | 2,494 |
| Arboretum | 16% | 485 | 3,028 |
| Cathedral | 16.8% | 540 | 3,215 |
| Nunnery | 18.3% | 636 | 3,475 |
| Dines Green & Grove Farm | 23.1% | 589 | 2,555 |
| Fort Royal | 23.2% | 500 | 2,157 |
| Rainbow Hill | 23.9% | 675 | 2,824 |
| Warndon & Elbury Park | 30% | 1,410 | 4,706 |
Local places and initiatives
Angel Place, Worcester city centre
Scala arts centre and Corn Exchange
Historic buildings are being refurbished for film, performance and community activities.
Construction underway; opening targeted for summer 2027 · evidence dated 2026-08-25
Responsible body: Worcester City Council and Speller Metcalfe
What the source says: The August update separates building completion from power-supply and street-access works needed before opening. Its November 2026, February 2027 and summer 2027 dates are targets, not delivered milestones.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No official project-to-ward mapping has been verified; no ward allocation is inferred from a city or street name.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Worcester City Council set to complete its biggest regeneration programme next summer →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Connect Worcester’s new arts venue to practical walking and wheeling routes →
Connect local skills to local opportunities →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →Shrub Hill Road to Pheasant Street via Cromwell Street, Worcester
Shrub Hill walking and cycling link
A new shared route connects the regeneration area across the canal to the city centre.
Route completed and opened · evidence dated 2026-04-27
Responsible body: Worcestershire County Council and Worcester City Council
What the source says: The council confirms opening of this route. That is one completed element of the broader Shrub Hill programme, not evidence that all planned housing and commercial redevelopment is complete.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No official project-to-ward mapping has been verified; no ward allocation is inferred from a city or street name.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
New shared use link at Shrub Hill Quarter now open →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Connect Worcester’s new arts venue to practical walking and wheeling routes →
How to track delivery →The Hopmarket, Worcester city centre
Hopmarket renewal and tenant transition
The historic Hopmarket needs investment in its fabric. Plans to pursue sale and regeneration also require support for residents and existing businesses.
Sale and regeneration pathway announced; future redevelopment subject to planning · evidence dated 2026-03-26
Responsible body: Worcester City Council, Hopmarket Charity and Platform Housing Group
What the source says: The March statement describes phased moves for residential tenants with no immediate deadline at that time, and engagement with commercial leaseholders. It confirms a proposed transition, not completed sale, approved redevelopment or completed rehousing.
Next thing to establish: What is the approved cost, including ongoing maintenance?
Progress, funding and source
- Cost
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Funding
- Not established by the evidence checked.
- Area covered
- No verified current ward footprint is assigned. The named location or council-wide remit does not establish benefits in every ward.
No verified ward footprint is assigned.
Hopmarket renewal and tenant transition →
Source checked 2026-10-17. A plan or announcement is not proof of completion.
Questions for the next progress report
- Which funding is committed, and what remains conditional?
- Which neighbourhoods are covered by an official project plan, and which benefits still need testing?
- What is the next published milestone, and what evidence will show residents benefit?
Protect homes and businesses while renewing Hopmarket →
Make room for homes people can afford →
Connect local skills to local opportunities →
Target support where disadvantages overlap →
How to track delivery →